Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accupos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Accupos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company. Article was deleted before and creator banned. Recently the article was recreated by a suspected sockpuppet of the original creator. Article survived a speedy deletion for lack of notability on account of having sources, but I would not consider the current sources to be enough to satisfy WP:Corp Yoenit (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a software company that develops and publishes point of sale, inventory and timeclock solutions., i.e. an average business in a crowded field. No claims of historical, technical, or cultural importance, only a bunch of minor awards and achievements like The Sleeter Group's "Awesome QuickBooks Add-on" and a gold developer for Quickbooks, achievements that, though real, do not establish that this business has a place in history that means it gets an encyclopedia article. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no significant coverage, ref provided read like press releases. Nuujinn (talk) 23:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.